Generally speaking, Hegel’s look at the new unification out of awareness with Getting is understood towards three basis off their ontology, reasoning and you may epistemology. They appear become identical as Are ‘s the worry about-externalisation of awareness. Yet, on the other side he could be additional given that Being ‘s the tip with its otherness and you will alienated of consciousness.
Consciousness try drawn given that ‘thesis’ being while the ‘antithesis’. Thesis and you can antithesis are exactly the same while the antithesis is derived from thesis, and other while the antithesis is something aside from thesis.
If we see awareness being on awesome-triad of Hegel’s ontology, we discover them as a couple main oppositions having an excellent dialectic relationship
Epistemological unification is the theorisation to be. It is done after dialectic path out-of consciousness in which Being was apprehended conceptually and changed into ideality. This direction off truth to ideality makes several other movement from ideality to a different reality. The first a portion of the Phenomenology treats four epistemological amount using which awareness expands alone and you will transforms Are. It moves from ‘Sense-certainty’ to ‘Perception’, ‘Understanding’ and you can ‘Reason’. Inside the every one of these epistemological values Are will lose taking care of regarding its versatility up until within final phase off need otherwise intellectual knowledge the independence to be is completely negated being will get tip and the property off understanding. After achieving the idealisation to be, the latest dialectic movement out-of awareness integrates toward “Dialectic out of Work” otherwise idea into habit by using ‘Desire’ (Begierde) and you will ‘Labour’. It converts Hegel’s viewpoints out-of sheer epistemological tendency to a pragmatic method to reality. When you look at the “Dialectic from Awareness” Are was conceptualised and won’t entirely fade away. Paradoxically, Are have to be both kept and you may destroyed. Focus attempts to look after it paradox by simply making Getting a unique property. With this particular move in order to standard surface understanding discovers by itself met with a special fact which is so much more concerned with lives and you will societal argument.
So it contradiction among them try, although not, fixed and you will superseded inside their unity knew since the ‘synthesis’
From inside the thinking, awareness contemplates Are and you will becomes familiar with it. Here, which malfunction off contemplation off awareness on Becoming is Cartesian. But Hegel’s account out of understanding is different from one provided by Descartes. Humans, into the dialectic beliefs, are not only thought-beings also notice-aware. All of our awareness of this new items globally are going to be observed because of the mind-feel. For Hegel, consciousness gets familiar with in itself and you will sets out to prove their arms to be by the selecting alone in a state out-of ‘Desire’, a deliberate reflection in which awareness will get aware of the fresh new objects also itself. While i be dehydrated and achieving need to drink liquids, I discover a few things: the presence of the necessary target (water) and therefore ‘I’ are thirsty.
The idea of ‘I’ are revealed in my opinion due to my personal need to take in liquids and at once We decide to lead my bad capacity to features and assimilate the necessary object. In such a case, ‘Desire’ will get an electricity of negation and modifies the necessary target on the something exploit https://datingranking.net/pl/waplog-recenzja/. Kojve has actually revealed new part off ‘Desire’ to possess revealing self-awareness such as this,
“Appeal is shown while the my personal attract, and to tell you focus, one must utilize the phrase “We.” Man was immersed from this contemplation of your own thing in vain; once curiosity about one matter is due, he’s going to quickly end up being “brought back to himself.” Quickly he will notice that, as well as the issue, there was his contemplation, there was themselves, that isn’t you to definitely point. Additionally the material seems to your given that an object (gegen-stand), just like the an external facts, that isn’t during the your, that’s not the guy, but a non-We.”